This method of periodization was not perfect for Indian scenario because this had its own limitations. The limitation was that except Europe, we couldn’t find sequences and evidences to define these three ages in other countries of the world. … In Europe presence of these features were symbol of modern age.
What is the problem with periodization of Indian history?
The problem with the periodisation of Indian history by James Mill is that he divided the Indian history into Hindu, Muslim and the British period. It has been argued by many historians that it is not correct to periodise the Indian history on the basis of religion of the rulers.
Why the British historians periodization of Indian history is not correct one?
Historians face many problems while dividing the past into periods. The reason is that there was a good amount of technological development in the medieval period which can be called modern in the contemporary context. … On the other hand, the modern past is followed by the medieval past.
Why was James Mill’s periodisation unacceptable by the Indian historians what basis of periodisation did they follow?
It was not accepted by Indian historians because it did not provide a complete view on everyone. James Mill divided Indian history into three parts: Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation does not help use understand the lives of other minority.
Which is the most accepted periodization of Indian history?
James Mill’s Periodization
The most commonly accepted and less controversial periodization of Indian history is still based on the one proposed by James Mill in his History of British India. 1 As everybody knows, such periodization sees Indian history as articulated in a Hindu, a Muslim and a British period.
How did James Mill View the India?
The sole purpose of Mill to state a view about India was to defend the reason behind British intervention in Indian affairs. According to him India was backward and had unacceptable culture. … He further organized the country into three eras and stated that India grew or made changes only in terms of religious practices.
Why periodization of history is relevant?
Periodization is one of the essential tools of any historical study. The division of time into periods is a long-standing tradition in the humanities and social sciences, and central to the relationship between past, present, and future within a given society.
How history is divided?
For example, historical time is divided between B.C. (Before Christ) and A.D. (Anno Domini). … Another common way world history is divided is into three distinct ages or periods: Ancient History (3600 B.C.-500 A.D.), the Middle Ages (500-1500 A.D.), and the Modern Age (1500-present).
How many types are sources of Indian history?
Literary and Archaeological records are the two main categories that give evidences of Ancient Indian History. The literary source includes literature of Vedic, Sanskrit, Pali, Prakrit, and other literature along with other foreign accounts.
On what basis have they Periodised Indian history?
The most commonly accepted and less controversial periodization of Indian history is still based on the one proposed by James Mill in his History of British India. As everybody knows, such periodization sees Indian history as articulated in a Hindu, a Muslim and a British period.
Why was it unacceptable to the historians?
It was not correct to periodise mediaeval India as Muslim History because people belonging to different faiths existed during this time. Such periodisation which was based on the religion of the rulers suggests that the lives, practices and culture of the other people do not matter.
What are important parts of Indian history?
India history timeline
- 2500–1600BC. Harappan (Indus Valley) Civilisation.
- 1500BC onwards. Central Asian Aryans migrate to the Indian subcontinent.
- 563BC. Birth of Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha. c. 325BC. Chandragupta Maurya founds the Mauryan empire. c. 260BC. King Ashoka converts to Buddhism. c. AD320.
Why is history divided into three periods?
Answer: Historians try and divide history into different periods to capture the characteristics of a particular time. This helps to focus on the central features of a time. This also shows how we see the significance of the change from one period to the next.
Why do Indian historians call the modern period the colonial period?
Indian historians call the modern period as the colonial period because at that time India was ruled and controlled by the British,i.e. India became the colony of British.. This is the reason why Indian historians called modern period as colonial period…..